BIO-key delivers the
tools needed to integrate secure, convenient authentication NOW!
Results of recent
studies reveal consumer concern and the significant increase in identity theft.
These studies reveal that consumers prefer to
replace less secure, less convenient methods of ID
authentication with biometrics.
You can quickly & easily meet these
consumers preferences!
The Impact of Identity Theft on Businesses & Consumers
Medical ID theft one of fastest
growing crimes , 1.5 Million American
Victims of Medical ID Theft (4-1-2010, Smart
Card Alliance)
Identity
theft 'increases by 20% in 2009 , with
72% of 2009 ID theft occurring in second half of year
(3-19-2010, Experian)
Javelin Study Finds Identity Fraud Reached New High
in 2009 ( 2-10-2010)
Court
Allows Woman to Sue Bank for Lax Security,
"Bank Should Have Offered Strong Authentication"
Health
care attorney: ID Theft can be a killer ,
Medical identity theft can be hazardous to your health
Diagnosis: ID Theft,
For $60, a thief
can buy your health records
&use them to get costly care. Guess who gets the bill?
I dentity
Theft At An All Time High: As of
8/22/08, Data Breach count for 2008 exceeds total for all of 2007!
FTC Issues Rules in ID Theft Red Flags:
"ID theft results in billions of dollars in losses yearly
to individuals & businesses"
Medical ID theft one of fastest
growing crimes
Thursday, April 1, 2010
in News
There are a
number of reasons strong identification is needed in health care. Making sure
the correct electronic health record is connected to the correct patient would
be the foremost but there’s also the growing crime of medical identity theft,
according to a report released from the Smart Card Alliance.
“Many
authorities consider medical identity theft one of the fastest growing crimes in
America,” the report states. “With the digital age of health care upon us, the
risks are expected to increase as electronic medical records become more
prevalent and the exchange of this data over expanding networks becomes more
pervasive. Heightened concern over personal data security and privacy highlight
the importance of having secure electronic medical identities.
Nearly
1.5 million Americans have been victims of medical identity theft with an
estimated total cost of $28.6 billion–or approximately $20,000 per victim,
according to a recent Ponemon Institute study.
There is
other evidence of medical identity theft issued as well. The Department of
Health and Human services also allocated $1.7 billion for fraud detection in the
2011 and an Identity Theft Resource Center 2009 Data Breach Stats show 68
reported health care data breaches in the U.S. that put more than 11.3 million
patient records at risk of exposure.
Patients
whose medical identities are stolen face various, long-lasting effects.
Fraudulent health care events can leave erroneous data in medical records. This
incorrect data–like information about tests, diagnoses and procedures–can impact
future health care and insurance coverage and costs.
Patients are
often unaware of medical identity theft until a curious bill or a surprising
line of questioning by a doctor exposes the issue. Then, the burden of proof is
often with the patient and it can be difficult to get the patient’s legitimate
medical records cleaned up. The consequences can also be life threatening and
can lead to serious medical errors and fatalities.
The way to
stop medical identity theft and identity confusion is to improve patient
identification and provide enhanced data protection. Strong authentication and
data encryption are methods that can achieve these goals, the Alliance report
states.
“To address
medical identity theft, solutions need to provide higher levels of assurance
than today’s processes, whether the interactions are in person or remote.
Identity management is a crucial foundation for health care, and solutions that
incorporate smart card technology can be used to address the security and
privacy challenges facing the industry. This foundation can be put in place
without reinventing the wheel. The federal government has already established a
set of best practices, standards and technology solutions for smart card-based
identity management and authentication that can be adapted to and leveraged by
the health care industry.”
Link to
Article:
http://www.secureidnews.com/2010/04/01/sca-medical-id-theft-one-of-fastest-growing-crimes
Return to Top
Identity Theft 'increases
by 20%
Numbers looked
set to continue rising this year, as 72% of all identity theft
attempts had taken place during the second half of last year.
Yahoo Finance, March
19,2010
Identity theft soared by 20%
during 2009 as fraudsters increasingly targeted less
well-off consumers, a report has claimed.
Information services group
Experian said it handled more than 5,000 cases where people
had their identities stolen during the year, nearly a
fifth more than in 2008.
I t warned that numbers looked set to continue
rising this year, as 72% of all identity theft attempts had
taken place during the second half of last year.
The group said analysis of information collected through
its National Hunter fraud data sharing scheme showed that
wealthy people continued to be at the greatest risk of
having their identity stolen, with company directors and
business owners most likely to be victims.
But it warned that there was a growing trend among
fraudsters to target mass-market victims, with criminals
carrying out a high volume of low-value frauds on people
whose identities were easier to steal, rather than focusing
on high net worth individuals. As a result, it said young
couples, single parents and people who lived in shared
rented accommodation were now at a high risk of being
victims of fraud.
The trend has led to areas with a high proportion of
new-build properties that are rented out becoming identity
fraud hotspots, such as Salford's Quays development,
Manchester's Liverpool Street and Cardiff's dockside
regeneration area.
Experian also reported a rise in so-called first party
fraud, under which individuals lie on application forms to
try to obtain financial products they would not otherwise
qualify for. Going forward the group expects insurance fraud
to rise to £2.5 billion, while mortgage fraud could total
£1.2 billion, due to the ongoing shortage of sub-prime and
self-certification mortgages.
It said the level of insurance fraud that was being
detected nearly doubled during the final quarter of last
year, rising from nine detected frauds for every 10,000
applications in the third quarter to 16 per 10,000
applications during the final three months of the year. It
attributed the jump to hard-pressed consumers claiming for
goods on their home insurance policies that they could no
longer afford to replace themselves.
Nick Mothershaw, director of fraud and identity solutions
at Experian, said: "Attempted fraud is on the increase and
the nature of the threat is changing. Organised criminal
fraudsters are moving into the mass-market, looking beyond
those with obvious wealth towards lower-value but more
vulnerable targets.
"At the same time, financial stress brought about by the
recession is driving increasing numbers of people to commit
fraud to maintain their lifestyles. As a result, financial
institutions could be faced with sustained fraud attacks
during 2010."
Click here
to link to Yahoo Article
Return to Top
Javelin Study Finds
Identity Fraud Reached New High in 2009, but
Consumers are Fighting Back
Feb 10, 2010
SAN FRANCISCO, February 10, 2010 – The 2010
Identity Fraud Survey Report – released today by
Javelin Strategy & Research – found that the
number of identity fraud victims in the United
States increased 12 percent to 11.1 million
adults in 2009, while the total annual fraud
amount increased by 12.5 percent to $54 billion
. The report found that protection of data by
consumers and businesses and enlisting
assistance in resolution are helping consumers
and businesses resolve fraud more quickly, and
are also reducing or eliminating costs for the
consumer. Average fraud resolution time dropped
30 percent to 21 hours, and nearly half of
victims now file police reports, resulting in
double the reported arrests, triple the
prosecutions, and double the percentage of
convictions in 2009.
Now in its seventh consecutive year, the
comprehensive identity fraud survey report is
independently produced by Javelin
Strategy & Research and co-sponsored by leading
companies in financial services and identity
fraud prevention technology and resolution.
Co-sponsors in 2009 include Fiserv, Inc.,
Intersections Inc., Wells Fargo & Company and
ITAC, the Identity Theft Assistance Center. The
survey is the nation’s longest-running study of
identity fraud, with more than 29,000 U.S.
respondents over the past seven years. Identity
fraud is defined as the unauthorized use of
another person’s personal information to achieve
illicit financial gain. In November 2009,
Javelin conducted telephone interviews with more
than 5,000 U.S. consumers to identify and track
the methods fraudsters used, the impact of fraud
on Americans and how these findings can help
consumers most effectively avoid becoming
victims of fraud.
“The
2010 Identity Fraud Survey Report shows that
fraud increased for the second straight year and
is at the highest rate since Javelin began this
report in 2003 ,”
said James Van Dyke, president and founder,
Javelin Strategy & Research. “The good news is
consumers are getting more aggressive in
monitoring, detecting and preventing fraud with
the help of technology and partnerships with
financial institutions, government agencies and
resolution services. Through IDSafety.net and
our free consumer report, Javelin and our
co-sponsor partners are working to educate
consumers and provide guidelines and tips to
help them safeguard their personal information.”
Other findings in this
year’s report reinforce the trend that
fraudsters are becoming increasingly savvy with
technology and are using personal information
stolen in data breaches to open new accounts or
to make changes to existing non-card accounts.
Financial institutions and businesses are
countering this by minimizing the use of Social
Security numbers in account information and more
proactively monitoring and notifying customers
of possible fraudulent activity. While consumers
are monitoring their accounts more frequently
using technologies such as online banking and
mobile alerts, consumer education on protection
and prevention measures such as keeping
anti-virus software up to date will continue to
be important.
Key
Survey Findings:
Fraud is Up, but
Consumer Costs and Resolution Hours Drop –
The number of identity fraud incidents
increased by 12 percent over 2008, reaching
the highest level since the survey started
in 2003. Javelin believes this may be due to
the economic downturn, when historically,
higher rates of fraud occur. However, during
2009 there was a drop in fraud costs per
victim and a decrease in time to resolution,
thanks to increased consumer awareness,
assistance provided by financial
institutions, consumer support
organizations, and law enforcement.
Increase in New Account
Fraud – Identity fraud that resulted from
fraudsters opening new accounts with stolen
information increased in 2009. The number of
fraudulent new credit card accounts increased to
39 percent of all identity fraud victims, up
from 33 percent in 2008. New online accounts
opened fraudulently more than doubled over the
previous year, and the number of new e-mail
payment accounts increased 12 percent. This year
for the first time, the survey asked about new
mobile phone account fraud and 29 percent of
victims reported new mobile phone accounts were
fraudulently opened.
Data Breaches Across
Various Industries Continue to Compromise
Personal Information – Identification most
likely to be compromised in a data breach
continues to be Full Name (63 percent) and
Physical Address (37 percent). With a
year-over-year increase of 4 percent, Health
Insurance Information is increasingly targeted.
The percentage of Social Security numbers
compromised decreased to 32 percent from 38
percent in 2008.
Technology is
empowering consumers against fraudsters, but
consumers need to take precautions
Electronic account monitoring and services
provided by financial institutions through
partnerships are allowing consumers to become
increasingly vigilant when it comes to detecting
and resolving identity fraud. Consumers are
adopting best practices in safeguarding their
personal and private information by reviewing
electronic statements and fraud alerts sent to
e-mail accounts and mobile devices, and not
responding to e-mail requests for personal
information such as “phishing.” Monitoring for
fraudulent activities with a mobile device
allows consumers to review and report identity
fraud in near-real-time, which can result in
lower victim costs and faster detection times.
Millennials lead all age groups in using
technology to resolve identity fraud, but only
after a fraudulent incident has occurred. They
are most likely to install anti-malware software
after fraud has been committed. They widely use
online banking and bill pay and are quick to
adopt mobile banking.
While technology is helping consumers to
monitor, detect and resolve identity fraud,
consumers should be vigilant about safeguarding
their personal information online and offline.
Consumers can leverage technologies that are
available
through their financial institutions to help
protect their information. Consumers should
follow best practices and change passwords
regularly, refrain from sharing passwords or
other account information, lock computers and
safeguard personal information, use a paper
shredder to destroy paper account documents,
keep anti-virus software up to date on their
personal computers, and use discretion when
sharing information on e-commerce sites. Mobile
banking and mobile commerce are not as yet
widely susceptible to fraud, however consumers
should apply the same practices to those
channels as well.
Click here
to link to full Javelin Press Release of findings
Citizens Financial Bank should have offered strong authentication, plaintiffs claim Jaikumar
Vijayan,
Computerworld.com ,
September 2,2009
A couple
whose
bank
account
was
breached
can sue
their
bank for
its
alleged
failure
to
implement
the
latest
security
measures
designed
to
prevent
such
compromises.
In a
ruling
issued
last
month,
Judge
Rebecca
Pallmeyer,
of the
District
Court
for the
Northern
District
of
Illinois,
denied a
request
by
Citizens
Financial
Bank to
dismiss
a
negligence
claim
brought
against
it by
Marsha
and
Michael
Shames-Yeakel.
The
Crown
Point,
Ind.
couple
--
customers
of the
bank --
alleged
that Citizens'
failure
to
implement
up-to-date
user
authentication
measures
resulted
in the
theft of
more
than
$26,000
from
their
home
equity
line of
credit.
The
negligence
claim
was one
of
several
claims
brought
against
Citizens
by the
couple.
Although,
Pallmeyer
dismissed
several
of the
other
claims,
she
allowed
the
negligence
claim
against
Citizens
to
stand.
She
noted
that the
couple
had
shown
that a
"reasonable
finder
of fact
could
conclude
that the
bank
breached
its duty
to
protect
Plaintiffs'
account
against
fraudulent
access."
The
ruling
highlights
an issue
that
security
analysts
have
been
talking
about
for a
long
time:
the need
by
companies
to show
due
diligence
in
protecting
customer
data
against
malicious
and
accidental
compromise.
Security
analysts
have
warned
that
companies
that
can't
prove
they
took
adequate
measures
to
protect
data
could
find
themselves
exposed
to legal
liability
after a
data
breach.
Numerous
lawsuits
alleging
such
negligence
have
been
filed
against
companies
over the
last two
years.
Most of
those
cases,
however,
involved
payment
card
data
breaches
in which
large
numbers
of
accounts
were
compromised
and in
which
victims
want
compensation.
Courts
typically
sided
with the
breached
entities
in such
lawsuits,
and in
many
cases
summarily
dismissed
the
claims.
The
decision
in the
Shames-Yeakel
case was
first
reported
on Digital
Media
Lawyer
Blog ,
which is
written
by David
Johnson,
a lawyer
specializing
in
digital
media
law with
Jeffer,
Mangels,
Butler
and
Marmaro
LLP in
Los
Angeles.
The case
shows
how the
failure
to
expeditiously
implement
state-of-the-art
security
measures
can open
companies
to
negligence
claims,
Johnson
wrote.
The
ruling
shows
that a
"failure
to
implement
the
latest
and
greatest
in data
protection
measures
may be
found to
be a
breach
of
expected
standards
of
care,"
he
warned.
The
dispute
stems
from a
February
2007
incident
in which
an
intruder
gained
access
to the
Shames-Yeakel's
equity
credit
line
account
using
their
username
and
password.
The
intruder
then
proceeded
to take
an
advance
of
$26,500
from the
account
and
transfer
it to a
bank in
Austria.
The
fraudulent
transaction
wasn't
discovered
by the
couple
until 10
days
later,
by which
time it
was too
late to
recover
the
money.
Citizens held the couple responsible for paying back the money, and claimed that under its online terms and conditions it had no liability for any unauthorized transactions that were made using legitimate usernames and passwords. It said there was no liability unless it had been notified in advance about the possibility of unauthorized use and had been given a reasonable opportunity to act on that notice.
Citizens also had claimed that its online banking services were being provided and protected by a highly reputable company. In addition to the third-party security services, Citizens said it had its own measures for protecting access to user account.
But the Shames-Yeakels claimed those measures were inadequate. They said that at the time of the breach, Citizens was still relying on usernames and passwords to control access to accounts while others had begun using two-factor authentication, including token-based authentication, that is considered more secure. They pointed to a 2005 document by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), which called single-factor authentication inadequate and recommended the use of two-factor authentication by banks.
In her ruling, Pallmeyer noted that Citizens had begun implementing stronger authentication measures in 2007 but supported only single-factor authentication at the time of the theft. The apparent delay in complying with the FFIEC's recommendations could indicate that the bank had breached its duty to protect account holder information, she wrote.
Although the judge has cleared the case for trial, no court date has been set, and Citizens' officials declined to comment on the pending litigation.
Health care attorney:
ID theft can be a killer Marie Price, The Journal Record November 12,
2008
OKLAHOMA CITY – Medical
identity theft can be hazardous to your
health – literally – says attorney Cori
Loomis. Former general
counsel for the
Oklahoma State
Medical Association,
Loomis said the
dangers from this
kind of ID theft
range from
financial, for both
providers and
patients, to
potentially deadly
treatment glitches.
She has been
educating health
care providers about
what ID theft could
mean to them.
“It could cost them
money and they could
end up getting sued
for medical
liability because of
medical identity
theft,” said Loomis,
a health care
attorney with Crowe
and Dunlevy.
For example, she
said that if someone
goes to a doctor
posing as a
particular patient
who has a different
blood type, the real
patient could be
harmed if he or she
later needs a
transfusion and
receives an
incompatible blood
type based upon the
ID thief’s medical
record.
“A lot of times, the
medical identity
theft is
consensual,” Loomis
pointed out. Sometimes, she said,
a person with
medical coverage
will “lend” his or
her insurance card
to an uninsured
friend or relative. “It comes up more
than you think,”
Loomis said. “It’s
going to come up
more and more as we
have job losses, the
economy’s tanking
and people become
more desperate for
health care, because
they’ve been laid
off.”
Such favors
can end up costing
the actual
health-plan member
money, from having
to pay back benefits
incorrectly paid, as
well as salting his
or her medical
records with
information that
could prove harmful
to future treatment.
Loomis said health
insurance companies
will also require
the physician or
hospital to return
funds paid for the
wrong person’s care. “I had a hospital
that I advised
recently,” she said.
“They had to return
a pretty significant
amount of money,
because they
provided care to a
person they thought
was insured.” Loomis
said that medical
identity theft can
be financially
devastating to
consumers.
“What if you go to
get credit and you
find out that you
owe to a hospital
you didn’t even to
go?” she said.
“That’s when a lot
of people discover
that their medical
identity has been
stolen, when they
get a credit
report.” Loomis
said there are steps
physicians and
consumers can take
to cut down on ID
theft.
Noting that most
health-insurance
cards do not carry
the member’s
picture, she said
doctors should
consider asking for
another form of ID.
“I’ve heard that
more insurers are
going to now,
somehow, start
putting pictures on
their ID cards,”
Loomis said. “But
right now they
don’t, so health
care providers need
to say, ‘I need a
picture ID as well
as your health
insurance card.’” Loomis said
consumers must
understand that it
is fraudulent to
lend an insurance
card to someone
else.
“They have to
safeguard it just
like their Social
Security card, start
treating it as that
kind of document,”
she added.
She said another
thing consumers can
do to reduce ID
theft is review
explanations of
benefits they
receive after a trip
to the doctor or
hospital for care. “That would tell you
‘I’m getting an EOB
for services I
didn’t get,’” she
said. “That’s your
first hint, ‘Someone
else is using my
card.’”
Loomis also urges
caution in giving
out personal
information in order
to receive so-called
“free” samples of
drugs. “You’ve
been told it’s free,
it’s free you, but
sometimes people
have been
fraudulently billing
the insurance
companies or billing
payers,” she said.
Loomis said the move
toward electronic
medical records has
some positive
attributes for
continuity of care
and other issues,
although some worry
that medical ID
theft might derail
the process. People
are so mobile these
days, she said, that
having their records
available
electronically could
prove valuable for
care purposes. “People are going to
have to make sure
that the systems are
secure,” she said.
“But also
individuals are
going to have to
watch.”
Click here
to link to Journal Record Article
Return to Top
Diagnosis: Identity Theft:
For $60, a thief can buy your health
records—and use them to get costly care. Guess who gets the
bill Business Week, January 8,2007
When Lind Weaver opened
her mailbox one day in early 2004, she was surprised to find
a bill from a local hospital for the amputation of her right
foot. Surprised because the 57-year-old owner of a horse
farm in Palm Coast, Fla., had never had worse than an
ingrown toenail. After weeks of wrangling with the
hospital's billing reps, Weaver finally stormed into the
facility and kicked her heels up on the desk of the chief
administrator. "Obviously, I have both of my feet," she told
him.
Weaver eventually persuaded the hospital
to drop the charges but in the process discovered that the
mistake wasn't a simple billing error. Weaver's identity had
been stolen by a fraudster who had used her personal
information—her address, Social Security number, and even
her insurance ID number—to have the expensive procedure
performed. The nightmare didn't end there. When Weaver was
hospitalized a year later for a hysterectomy, she realized
the amputee's medical info was now mixed in with her own
after a nurse reviewed her chart and said, "I see you have
diabetes." (She doesn't.) With medical data expected to
begin flowing more freely among health-care providers,
Weaver now frets that if she is ever rushed to a hospital,
she could receive improper care—a transfusion with the wrong
type of blood, for instance, or a medicine to which she's
allergic. "I now live in fear that if something ever
happened to me, I could get the wrong kind of medical
treatment," she says. Weaver's experience isn't an isolated
case. Medical identity theft—in which fraudsters impersonate
unsuspecting individuals to get costly care they couldn't
otherwise afford—is growing. Based on Federal Trade
Commission surveys, Pam Dixon, executive director of the
World Privacy Forum, a San Diego-based research group,
estimates that more than 250,000 Americans have had their
medical information stolen and misused in recent years. And
this isn't petty larceny. Experts note that while
individuals who have had their credit-card data stolen are
usually wrangling with their banks over losses of as little
as a few thousand dollars, medical ID theft can leave
victims, and the doctors and hospitals that provided the
care, staring at bills that are exponentially higher.
Yet the thief isn't always an individual desperately needing
medical care. In some instances, the perpetrator can be a
doctor hoping to pad his or her income by filing fraudulent
claims. Even worse, law enforcement authorities say that
more and more frauds are being perpetrated by organized
crime rings who steal dozens, and sometimes thousands, of
medical records, as well as the billing codes for doctors.
The rings then set up fake medical clinics—offering free
health screenings as a ruse to draw in patients—that submit
bogus bills to insurers, collect payments for a few months,
and then disappear before the insurers realize they've been
had. (Dixon notes that health records now fetch $50 to $60
each on the black market, vs. a mere 7 cents for stolen
résumés.) Last year, California authorities busted a ring in Milpitas
that recruited patients from a local senior citizen center
with offers of a free checkup and a case of Ensure
nutritional supplement. In the three months before
authorities raided the clinic, the ring had billed $900,000
for diagnostic tests it had never performed. "Yesterday's
drug dealers are now working in today's health-care fraud,"
says John Askins, an investigator in Florida's state
insurance fraud division. "It's more lucrative, and they
don't face the same dangers they do in the narcotics trade."
The penalties, if they're caught, are lower, too. Health-care providers say the Bush Administration's
initiative to push doctors and hospitals to convert their
paper-based patient files into digital records should help
reduce the number of medical ID frauds. "Our software has
become more sophisticated, particularly in identifying
spikes in usage—someone who normally goes to the doctor once
a year and suddenly goes 25 times in a 12-month period. It's
a red flag," says Byron Hollis, national anti-fraud director
for the Blue Cross Blue Shield Assn., a trade group for 39
health plans. But some privacy advocates fear that the rush toward digital
health records could ironically create new nightmares for
victims of medical ID theft. Rather than residing in a
single doctor's paper files, fraudulent information—such as
the erroneous diabetes diagnosis in Lind Weaver's
records—could circulate in other medical databases across
the country. Given that some medical ID thefts are "inside
jobs," wherein rogue clerks sell patient data to fraudsters
on the outside, privacy advocates believe that allowing data
to flow more freely around a national network could make
such thefts even easier. "We can expect [medical ID theft]
to grow the more we move toward an electronic health-care
system. It's going to be a disaster," says Dr. Deborah Peel,
an Austin (Tex.) psychiatrist and founder of the Patient
Privacy Rights Foundation. Even worse, it can be difficult for patients to purge any
fraud from their records. While the Fair Credit Reporting
Act gives victims of financial identity theft the right to
see and try to correct any mistakes in their credit records,
critics say that victims of medical ID theft don't have the
same recourse. Health privacy laws "are limited and don't
reflect the possibility of medical ID theft," notes Robert
Gellman, a leading privacy consultant in Washington.
"Negative information could just bounce around the system
forever." For some victims, the pain is real. Take the case of Joe
Ryan. In early 2004, the 60-year-old owner of a Colorado
sightseeing business (he flies passengers in a modern
replica of a 1939 biplane) got a bill from a hospital
outside Denver. The hospital was seeking $41,188 for surgery
that Ryan says he hadn't had performed. Ryan called the
hospital and, in time, realized that someone had stolen his
personal information to pay for the surgery. Eventually,
investigators traced the crime to a former clerk at a
newspaper in which Ryan had placed an ad for his sightseeing
business. "He asked for my Social Security number, and I now
realize I shouldn't have given it to him," says Ryan.
When Ryan tried to correct his records, he discovered how
difficult it can be for victims to clear their names. The
hospital wouldn't let him see his own medical records when
they determined that the signature on the driver's license
Ryan handed them didn't match the signature that the
perpetrator had used when he checked in. "They said I
couldn't be Joe Ryan," he recalls. While the hospital
eventually absorbed the loss, Ryan says he hasn't been able
to completely erase the supposedly unpaid debt from his
credit record. With his credit ruined, Ryan says he has had
to pay a stiff interest rate—six points over the prime
rate—when he refinanced his plane, and his insurance company
has jacked up his premium. "It has been like a glacier
moving over me," he says. "I'm just screwed because I'm
going to lose my airplane, my business, and my credit
rating." In other instances, the thief can be a patient's own doctor.
Debra Herritt discovered that after she and her husband
began seeing a Boston psychiatrist, Richard P. Skodnek, in
the 1990s. After two years of therapy, Herritt began
receiving statements from her insurer, Blue Cross & Blue
Shield Assn. of Massachusetts, showing that Skodnek had
billed Blue Cross for sessions the Herritts had already
covered. What's more, Herrit learned that Skodnek had also
billed her son and daughter for psychiatric sessions that
Debra says never occurred. "My children had never laid eyes
on him," she says. Fortunately for Herritt, the feds were
already on Skodnek's trail for defrauding other patients,
and in 1996 the psychiatrist was convicted on 136 counts.
Even then, Herritt says she spent the next couple of years
trying to convince Blue Cross that her children had never
been treated for depression. "It was an incredible invasion
of their lives," Herritt says now. "I just pray this doesn't
come back to haunt them somewhere down the road."
`YOU'D BE ASTONISHED'
Law enforcement authorities complain that
many health-care facilities do too little to protect their
patient data. Case in point: In September, federal
authorities arrested a scheduling clerk at the Cleveland
Clinic's Weston (Fla.) hospital who allegedly had passed on
the personal identification information of more than 1,100
patients to her cousin—who in turn submitted $2.8 million in
false claims to Medicare. "Hospitals have done a poor job of
implementing security procedures on their computer systems,"
says one federal investigator. "You'd be astonished how many
people have access to your medical records." (Cleveland
Clinic officials say they notified law enforcement officials
when fraud was detected in June, and say they've since
conducted an internal risk assessment to prevent such a
problem in the future.) In their defense, health-care executives say they've taken
steps in recent years to deter identity thieves. Some
hospitals, for instance, have begun reprogramming their
computer systems to restrict staffers from accessing any
patient data beyond what they need to do their jobs. And
some have instituted procedures to ensure patients are who
they claim to be. Among them is the University of Connecticut Health Center in
Farmington. After one patient impersonating a distant
relative gained admittance and ran up more than $76,000 in
bills in his cousin's name, hospital administrators two
years ago began requiring anyone seeking treatment to
produce a picture ID. "We've since had instances where
patients say, I left my ID in the car,' then leave and never
return," says Marie Whalen, the center's assistant
vice-president for ambulatory services. And beginning next
March, Whalen says the center will begin scanning these
picture IDs into their files to help staffers confirm each
patient's identity on subsequent visits. "Most people are
fine with that," she says. Indeed, it may be a small price
to pay to avoid ID theft.
Click here
to link to Business Week Article
Return to Top
I dentity Theft News: 2008 Data Breach Count
as of 8/22/08 surpasses total for 2007
August 22, 2008
Identity theft experts at The Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC)
found that the data breach count has reached an all-time
high. Information
management is critically important to all of us - as
employees and consumers. For that reason, the Identity
Theft Resource Center has been tracking security breaches
for the past three years, looking for patterns, new trends
and any information that may help us better protect data and
assist companies in their activities.
2008
Figures The total number of breaches in on the Identity Theft
Resource Center’s 2008 breach list surpassed the final total
of 446 reported in 2007, more than 4 months before the end
of 2008. As of 9:30 a.m. August 22nd, the number of
confirmed data breaches in 2008 stood at 449. The actual
number of breaches is most likely higher, due to
under-reporting and the fact that some of the breaches
reported, which affect multiple businesses, are listed as
single events. In the last few months, two subcontractors
became examples of these “multiple” events. In one case,
the customers and/or employees of at least 20 entities were
affected by a breach that the ITRC reported as a single
breach event.
It should be noted that the ITRC does not place an
inordinate weight on the count of records exposed.
While the ITRC breach list reflects compromised records of
more than 22 million people, in more than 40% of
breach events, the number of records exposed is not reported
or fully disclosed. This means the number of affected
records is grossly incomplete and unusable for any statistic
or research purpose.
The use of potentially affected records generally causes
more concern and is ‘news-sexy’. The ITRC breach list is a compilation of breaches confirmed
by various media sources, notification lists from state
governmental agencies. ITRC uses several websites to help
search for verifiable breaches, such as pogowasright.org,
phiprivacy.net, The Breach Blog and attrition.org. To
qualify breaches must include personal identifying
information that could lead to identity theft, especially
the loss of Social Security numbers.
Click here
for the 2008
ITRC Breach report .
Click here
for the
2008 ITRC Breach Stats Report broken down by categories
which includes the percentages for each category (business,
financial/credit, educational, governmental/military and
health care).
Please check regularly as this list is updated weekly.
Return to Top
Agencies Issue Final Rules on Identity Theft
Red Flags and Notices of Address Discrepancy
October 31, 2007
The Federal Trade Commission and the federal
financial institution regulatory agencies
have sent to the Federal Register for
publication final rules on identity theft
“red flags” and address discrepancies. The
final rules implement sections 114 and 315
of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act of 2003.
According to a report of the
President’s Identity Theft Task Force,
identity theft (a fraud attempted or
committed using identifying information of
another person without authority), results
in billions of dollars in losses each year
to individuals and businesses.
The final rules require each financial
institution and creditor that holds any
consumer account, or other account for which
there is a reasonably foreseeable risk of
identity theft, to develop and implement an
Identity Theft Prevention Program (Program)
for combating identity theft in connection
with new and existing accounts. The Program
must include reasonable policies and
procedures for detecting, preventing, and
mitigating identity theft and enable a
financial institution or creditor to:
Identify relevant patterns,
practices, and specific forms of
activity that are “red flags” signaling
possible identity theft and incorporate
those red flags into the Program;
Detect red flags that have been
incorporated into the Program;
Respond appropriately to any red
flags that are detected to prevent and
mitigate identity theft; and
Ensure the Program is updated
periodically to reflect changes in risks
from identity theft.
The agencies also issued guidelines to
assist financial institutions and creditors
in developing and implementing a Program,
including a supplement that provides
examples of red flags.
The final rules also require credit and
debit card issuers to develop policies and
procedures to assess the validity of a
request for a change of address that is
followed closely by a request for an
additional or replacement card. In addition,
the final rules require users of consumer
reports to develop reasonable policies and
procedures to apply when they receive a
notice of address discrepancy from a
consumer reporting agency.
The attached final rulemaking is issued
by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, the Federal Trade
Commission, the National Credit Union
Administration, the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, and the Office
of Thrift Supervision. The final rules are
effective on January 1, 2008. Covered
financial institutions and creditors must
comply with the rules by November 1, 2008.
The final rule will be published soon and
can be found on the Commission’s Web site as
a link to this press release. The Commission
vote authorizing the publication of the
final rule and Federal Register notice was
5-0. (FTC File No. R611019). The staff
contacts are Naomi Lefkovitz or Pavneet
Singh, Bureau of Consumer Protection,
202-326-2252; see press release dated July
18, 2006.
Copies of the document
mentioned in this release are available from
the FTC’s Web site at
http://www.ftc.gov and from the FTC’s
Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC
20580. Call toll-free: 1-877-FTC-HELP.
Return to Top