Register to receive our Newsletter

                Consumers Worldwide Overwhelmingly Support Biometrics To Establish Identity
           
                 Also Favor Biometrics as Preferred Method to Combat Fraud and ID Theft
                                  

 BIO-key delivers the tools needed to integrate secure, convenient authentication NOW!
               

Results of recent studies reveal consumer concern and the significant increase in identity theft. Additionally these studies find that consumers prefer to replace existing, less secure, less convenient methods of identity authentication with biometrics
  

Click to read details on:          
           DHS Secretary Chertoff
recommends fingerprint biometrics
to protect theft of an individual’s identity.  
          Passwords Spells Biometric PC Boom  
Sales of computers with built-in fingerprint readers are skyrocketing!
         Accenture Study: r
ecommends biometric solutions, specifically, fingerprint readers to prevent ID theft.      
          Independent Study:
Vast majority of U.S. consumers trust convenience & security of fingerprint ID               
         Unisys Study:   
Consumers Overwhelmingly Support Biometrics
for Identity Verification
            IBM Study:   
Consumers Concern Over Identity Theft and Credit Card Fraud- cite biometrics to protect ID
            TSSI Systems Study:   
UK Study Reveals Dramatic, Positive Shift in Public Perception of Value of Biometrics
            KnowledgeStorm Study:
Sophisticated Password Schemes Are  "High Maintenance" and Not Effective           
         Consumer Strategy Report:
Majority of bank customers concerned about security of PINs& Passwords 

ID Theft Impact On Business and Consumers
           Identity Theft News:
As of 8/22/08, Data Breach count for 2008 exceeds total for all of 2007!
        
Diagnosis: ID Theft, For $60, a thief can buy your health records &use them to get costly care. Guess who gets the bill?
        
  FTC Issues Rules in ID Theft Red Flags:  "ID theft results in billions of dollars in losses yearly to individuals and businesses"
    

Retailers, Financial Institutions, Solutions Suppliers: Click here to learn how you can quickly & easily meet these consumers preferences!.

Concerned that the personal identities of millions of U.S. citizens are far from secure, DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff has recommended that the country essentially embrace three-factor authentication -- which he called "the three D’s: description, device, and digit" -- to make it harder for thieves to steal an individual’s identity.

Chertoff offered this suggestion during remarks he delivered on Aug. 13 at the University of Southern California, where he emphasized the importance of securing one’s identity.

"In the 21st Century, the most important asset that we have to protect as individuals, and as part of our nation, is the control of our identity, who we are, how we identify ourselves, whether other people are permitted to masquerade and pretend to be us, and thereby damage our livelihood, damage our assets, damage our reputation, damage our standing in our community," Chertoff declared.

To guard against identity theft, Chertoff said, Americans are accustomed to using two traditional approaches, either separately or in tandem: an official card or document (such as a passport or a driver’s license) or a specific piece of unique identifying information (such as an individual’s social security number). Unfortunately, he argued, both of these approaches are far from perfect.

Documents can be forged, false IDs can be acquired illegally, and "sometimes we allow people to identify themselves using documents that are even unofficial," he observed.

Specific identifying data, such as social security numbers, pose their own risks. True, a social security number, in and of itself, doesn’t reveal anything personal about its holder; it’s simply an identity authenticator. "Yet, if you think about it," Chertoff told his audience at USC’s National Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events, "using a number or a word as an authenticator carries its own inherent vulnerability because as you give the number to people who are going to authenticate you, they now have the number."

Chertoff recommended that our society continue utilizing the tools of the 20th Century to "harden" these two forms of identity protection -- by making it more difficult to counterfeit an official card or document and by making it harder for thieves to gain access to unique social security numbers.

"We’ve put chips in passports. We’ve created pass cards. We’ve put bar codes in. We’ve embedded certain kinds of holograms, all of which are designed to make it more difficult for people to fabricate these cards," explained Chertoff. "And we’ve required higher standards through things like our Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative which governs what people need to show when they cross a land border or our Transportation Worker Identity Card or even the Real ID Initiative to strengthen the security of our driver’s licenses."

In addition, Chertoff said he supports the use of encryption to safeguard social security numbers and bank account PIN numbers, but recognized that encryption is only a partial solution.

"I want to remind you, every time you get on a telephone, and you give your credit card to somebody in a company as a way of validating your identity, you are trusting that the person on the end of the line is not going to misuse it," Chertoff warned.

Chertoff does not strike me as the type of person who easily trusts an anonymous voice at the end of a telephone line. That’s probably why he is advancing the notion of adding 21st Century tools to further strengthen our citizens’ personal identities.

That’s what brings Chertoff to his three D’s – description, device and digit.

Of course, the notion of three-factor authentication is not new and startling within the U.S. security community, but Chertoff probably thought the concept was worth explaining to a broader audience of Americans.

"Description means some piece of information or something known to you, and not to anybody else, that can separate you from the other person," he said. (Your mother’s maiden name or your favorite pet’s name are classic examples.)

A device could be a traditional credit card, but it could also be a cell phone that carries a token which serves as an identification tool. "Many of you actually use cell phones as identification devices now because you can get on the Internet with your BlackBerry," said Chertoff. "You’re using an identification device. So this is not some startling insight by me. It’s a recognition of where we’re headed."

A digit, namely a person’s fingerprint biometric, could serve as the third leg of the stool. "Your fingerprint is unique and the ability to use that as an identifier, as we do, for example, throughout the criminal justice system, gives us a third powerful tool that we can use in order to make sure that we can separate real people from impersonators," Chertoff added.

The DHS secretary said he can envision a time when individuals who want to get on an airplane, transact business with a bank or gain entry to a student dormitory will be asked to authenticate themselves using the three D’s -- a description, a device and a digit.

He’s probably right.

To view the article on Government Security News website, click the following link:
 http://www.gsnmagazine.com/cms/features/news-analysis/998.html

Return to Top



 

Password Fatigue Spells Biometric PC Boom
September 15,, 2008

Security Strategy
 

Sales of computers with built-in fingerprint readers are skyrocketing.

According to Comet, PCs and laptops with fingerprint scanners made up around seven per cent of all May-to-July computer sales - a jump of 91 per cent on the preceding three months.

According to Comet, the rise in sales of PCs with biometrics scanners comes as a result of Britons seeking better security while becoming increasingly fed up with remembering numerous passwords.

According to research by the retailer, 82 per cent of the 1,300 Comet customers surveyed had had enough of passwords and want a better way to log into their machines.

Meanwhile, password security remains lax, with 30 per cent of those surveyed saying they share their passwords with workmates, friends or family and 11 per cent claiming to enter the word 'password' to get access to their computer.

 

To view the article, click the following link:   http://software.silicon.com/security/0,39024655,39288051,00.htm

Return to Top



 

Stopping ID Theft With Biometrics
June 19, 2008
Wall Street and Technology
Accenture recommends the use of biometric solutions — specifically, fingerprint readers -- to prevent identity theft.

Consumers are pointing to themselves as the greatest threat to secure online financial services. A recent survey by global consulting firm Accenture reveals that 88 percent of respondents believe that personal irresponsibility is the top cause of identity theft. Further, nearly half of respondents admit to being careless with their online security by sharing or not properly disposing of personal information.

Accenture surveyed 800 U.S. and U.K. consumers who use broadband or high-speed Internet connections at home. One strategy that Accenture recommends to counter users' lax attitudes toward security is the adoption of biometric solutions. Specifically, the firm recommends fingerprint readers to ensure the security of online transactions.

With the use of solutions such as fingerprint readers, "The human problem is alleviated because, unlike passwords, a fingerprint biometric cannot be readily shared, lost or stolen," explains Rob Blau, VP of development for UPEK, a fingerprint sensor vendor. "The technology largely removes the human elements of credential management by shifting the burden to technology without sacrificing usability."

Vendors such as UPEK are battling barriers to biometric adoption, including a lack of consumer awareness of the benefits of biometrics and the cost to financial services companies to deploy and support fingerprint scanners. According to Blau, however, the attach rate of fingerprint scanners for notebook computers and mobile phones is increasing, and the cost of deploying the technology is expected to subside.

To view the article on the Wall Street & Technology website, click the following link:
 http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/data-security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208700637

Return to Top



 

Survey Shows Highly Favorable Consumer Perceptions for Fingerprint Sensors
Tuesday January 29, 8:00 am ET
Online Banking, PC Security and E-Commerce Rated Highest among Desired Fingerprint Sensor-Enabled Applications

MELBOURNE, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--According to a recent consumer survey, a vast majority of U.S. consumers trust in the convenience and security benefits of fingerprint authentication, especially as it relates to online banking, PC security and electronic commerce (e-commerce) applications. The survey indicates that a clear majority (77%) is ready to begin using fingerprint sensors as part of their part of their day-to-day activities, signaling the strong growth potential for broad consumer adoption

The independent survey of U.S. consumers, sponsored by leading fingerprint sensor and solutions provider AuthenTec (NASDAQ:AUTH ), shows two-thirds (66%) of consumers trust fingerprint biometrics as a means of authentication more than traditional PINs or passwords while 68% perceive the use of a fingerprint sensor to be more convenient.

Surprisingly, a similar majority (67%) claimed to have little or no knowledge of mainstream consumer electronic devices such as PCs and cell phones that feature a fingerprint sensor, despite their widespread availability. According to the survey results, 43 percent of respondents believe that less than one million fingerprint sensors are in use today. In fact, AuthenTec recently celebrated the shipment of its 25 millionth fingerprint sensor to the global marketplace in November, 2007.

“The survey reveals the chasm between strong end-user acceptance for fingerprint sensor-enabled devices and yet the low level of awareness of the widespread availability of products that feature our fingerprint sensors,” said AuthenTec Chairman & CEO Scott Moody. “This feedback is a reminder to the industry and consumer electronics manufacturers that there is a receptive buyer eager to enjoy the convenient security of fingerprint sensors.”

Correlation: Adoption and Online Comfort Level
According to the survey, the more often an individual conducts online banking and e-commerce, the more likely that person is to perceive the value of using fingerprint sensors and to consider more online activity. Two-thirds of survey respondents see the advantages of fingerprint sensors and their associated benefits for online banking and e-commerce, and would use the technology today to authorize payments and transactions online. As well, information security concerns among respondents also increased with more online activity.

Online Banking Rated as Most Desirable Application

  • When asked to rate their most desired application, online banking was the clear winner with information security second.

  • 75% of respondents said they use online banking services and 78% of those respondents said that, if available, they would use a fingerprint sensor to make online banking transactions more convenient and secure.

  • More than one third of those who do NOT use online banking would be more inclined to do so if a fingerprint sensor was part of the experience.

Consumers Think Creatively About Biometrics Applications
The broad consumer openness to using fingerprint-enabled devices revealed in the survey mirrors the enthusiasm and creative thinking on the part of hundreds of consumers who recently participated in the international Big Ideas contest sponsored by AuthenTec. 25 winning ideas, including the Grand Prize winning idea – a lockable diary that can only be opened by its owner – were selected by a panel of technology enthusiasts.

Because of the low cost and small size of AuthenTec’s sensors, many of the contest ideas for fingerprint sensor uses are already being implemented today – from fingerprint sensor-enabled PCs to uses in cell phones, GPS navigation devices, door locks and a host of other consumer and business applications.

AuthenTec’s fingerprint sensors are based on the Company’s patented TruePrint® technology which reads below the surface of the skin to the live layer where the true fingerprint resides. The sensors bring Power of Touch® features including security, convenience, personalization and navigation to over 17 million PCs and more than 8 million cell phones worldwide.

About the Survey
The survey, conducted in December, 2007 by independent online service Zoomerang, sampled U.S. men and women between the ages of 21-55. AuthenTec sponsored the survey as part of its ongoing effort to track consumer, business and government market security trends. Complete survey results are available at http://www.authentec.com/technology-market-surveys.html.

Return to Top


 

Consumers Worldwide Overwhelmingly Support Biometrics for Identity Verification, Says Unisys Study;
More Than Two-Thirds Also Favor Biometrics as Preferred Method to Combat Fraud and ID Theft
 

 
BLUE BELL, Pa, April 26, 2006--Nearly 70 percent of consumers worldwide support using biometrics technologies such as fingerprints or voice recognition administered by a trusted organization (e.g., a bank, healthcare provider or government organization) as a way to verify an individual's identity, according to new global research from Unisys Corporation  Click here for full story

In the first worldwide survey of its kind to study consumer security preferences, the Unisys research also found that 66 percent of consumers worldwide also favored biometrics as the ideal method to combat fraud and identity theft as compared to other methods such as smart cards and tokens. This finding shows a slight increase from separate research that Unisys conducted in September 2005, which found 61 percent of consumers worldwide favored biometrics as the preferred method to fight fraud and identity theft.

"This research is revealing since many headlines today seem to question biometric adoption because of legitimate privacy concerns," said Mark Cohn, vice president, homeland security solutions, Unisys Corporation. "System developers and owners must address those concerns so that these technologies can move toward the mainstream on a large scale with appropriate protection and sensitivity."

The Ponemon Institute, a leading independent firm that specializes in privacy and security research, conducted the survey on behalf of Unisys. Additional interesting findings on biometrics include:

* Convenience was the top reason for biometrics support with 82 percent citing the benefit of not having to remember separate passwords or other login data. More than three quarters of consumers cited improving the speed of the identity verification process as their primary reason for using biometrics.

* Consumers from North America support biometrics for identity verification more than any other region (71 percent), followed by Europe (69 percent) and Asia Pacific (68 percent). In contrast, Latin Americans were the least supportive (58 percent).

Return to Top


 

 
SOMERS, NY--(MARKET WIRE)-Nov 16, 2005 - Shoppers are concerned that their personal information is at risk of being stolen when they hit the stores -- physically or virtually -- this holiday season, according to an IBM survey of consumers. As a result, these shoppers say they plan to shop differently, more conservatively and possibly even spend less. Of those American consumers who plan to shop for the holidays, almost two-thirds (61%) of respondents say they are concerned for the safety of their personal and/or credit and debit card information during the busy holiday shopping season. Nearly half (49%) of those concerned believe their personal information is in jeopardy, while another 46 percent worry about their credit card information being stolen. More than one third (39%) are concerned about having their debit card information stolen.

 
When asked what would help alleviate their fears, nearly half of all consumers (49%) said that biometric technology (a fingerprint ID system) would be helpful.  Click here for full story

Return to Top


 

Biometrics gains British approval; 3 in 4 people now say they would welcome its use...
October 17, 2006
M2 Presswire


The UK public is now overwhelmingly in favour of wider biometrics use. Seventy-six per cent are more in favour of biometrics than they were one year ago. The striking opinion change comes after a year in which the UK has thwarted an airline terrorist plot and 15 months after the London transport bombings of July 2005.

Personal safety was identified as the biggest driver for the change: three-quarters of people believed it was important for combating terrorism. However, there is widespread public confusion about what biometrics means in practice, with the majority of people confused about the terminology. In addition, concerns about civil liberties were highlighted by almost a third of respondents.

These are the key findings of the TSSI Biometrics in Britain Study 2006, undertaken by TSSI Systems, Britain's document and identity security specialists.

Danny Chapchal, CEO of TSSI Systems said: "I was astonished by the dramatic change in public opinion. Eight in ten people changing their opinion in the last year is a huge increase and can only be attributable to the terrorist attacks. These have no doubt forced acceptance of biometrics upon the nation, but a positive campaign of education is needed to allay fears about its use."

Safety concerns Personal safety was identified as the biggest driver for the change. Three-quarters of people believed it was essential or important for combating terrorism, with only 17 per cent viewing intelligence information as more important to fight terrorism than biometrics. 79 per cent of people were in favour or more accepting about the introduction of biometrics for any travel abroad.

A strong pattern of ambivalence was evident over usage of biometrics in everyday situations, such as in the rail, tube, retail and airline networks. People's primary concern was for the safety of the individual, so that usage of biometrics in airports received a resounding seal of approval. Eight out of ten (77 per cent) approved of its use, with only nine per cent actively against and the remaining respondents undecided. Almost half approved of usage of biometrics in Britain's underground tube networks. However, usage of biometrics in banking and retail was rejected by 59 and 63 per cent respectively.

Biometrics confusion The survey also highlighted public confusion about what biometrics means in practice. For example, when respondents were asked whether they knew that they may be subjected to biometric checks when travelling abroad, the majority (58 per cent) claimed ignorance. However, nearly the same number (63 per cent) claimed they were aware of the pending introduction of new international standards that will mandate the logging face and optionally, fingerprint data (ie, biometric data) on passports.

Civil liberties Concerns about civil liberty infringements remain a pressing issue in the minds of a significant proportion of the population. Nearly a third (28 per cent) rejected the creation of a Government biometric database - even if it led to better crime detection rates. While 54 per cent were convinced of its benefits, a further 18 per cent remained undecided and could join either camp with persuasion.

"Peace of mind is the biggest factor in the change. But the trade off between security and convenience is also an influence. The catastrophic delays and stringent measures after the thwarted terror attack on UK airlines in August 2006 appear to have pushed the British public towards applications of convenience. Would they rather stand in a security queue for hours at Heathrow, or be subjected to biometric checks and get through quickly to the shops? It seems people are now overwhelmingly opting for the latter," said Chapchal.

Methodology TSSI surveyed 1000 people between the ages of 18 and 60 at mainland stations in the UK in September and October 2006. The TSSI Biometrics in Britain study 2006 management report with full details of the findings, issues raised and recommendations can be requested from the following website: http://www.tssi.co.uk/biometrics.html .  

Return to Top


Global research firms Nucleus Research and KnowledgeStorm study released 10/17/06

 One in three people write down computer passwords, undermining their security, and companies should look to more advanced methods, including biometrics, to ensure their systems are safe, according to this study performed by global research firms Nucleus Research and KnowledgeStorm. The study went on to report that companies' attempts to tighten IT security by regularly changing passwords and making them more complex by adding numbers as well as letters had no impact on security. Staff still had a tendency to jot down passwords either on a piece of paper or in a text file on a PC or mobile device. 

"This is really a lot like mom and dad buying a great new security system for the house and junior leaving the combination under the door mat," David O'Connell, senior analyst at Nucleus Research, told Reuters. The study, which surveyed 325 U.S. employees, found that a single sign-on system is just as effective as more complex schemes and that user education on the importance of proper password protection did not deter employees from their lax habits.

"Passwords are high maintenance. People forget them, people lose them, they have to be reset. Resending passwords is time intensive and costly. It takes up time at a help desk," said O'Connell.  The report suggested companies look instead to biometrics, such as voice recognition devices or thumbprint scanners, .

"It's these higher order techniques that companies need to shift to in order to get away from passwords," said O'Connell


 

Bank Customers Call For Tighter Security
July 8, 2008
Customer Strategy

More than half of bank customers (61%) concerned about the security of PIN, passwords and ‘secret data’ when used to confirm ID over the phone with a contact centre agent and four in ten (42%) of people using telephone banking believe their banks don’t take enough security measures to prevent fraud or identity theft.

These are the key findings of a new survey from Speechstorm and Genesys that investigated consumers’ attitudes towards current telephone banking security measures and voice biometrics. The survey’s results send a clear message to banks that they need to be more proactive in the use of technology, as over a third of respondents would be inclined to move to an alternative bank if it offered a more secure service such as voice biometrics as an identity verification measure.

The research was conducted by SpeechStorm and Genesys during May and June 2008 under the guidance of University of Ulster’s Head of Voice Authentication Research, Professor Michael McTear. During 30-minute face-to-face interviews, 41 per cent of respondents revealed that they believe their personal information is more secure when using an automated systems than speaking to a live agent (36 per cent) when handling PIN and passwords. Eighty six per cent of the candidates said they would be happier to use either voice biometrics (28 per cent) or a blend of both voice biometrics and PIN/Password (58 per cent) measures for telephone banking identification and verification.

Return to Top


 

Diagnosis: Identity Theft:   For $60, a thief can buy your health records—and use them to get costly care. Guess who gets the bill
Business Week, January 8,2007

When Lind Weaver opened her mailbox one day in early 2004, she was surprised to find a bill from a local hospital for the amputation of her right foot. Surprised because the 57-year-old owner of a horse farm in Palm Coast, Fla., had never had worse than an ingrown toenail. After weeks of wrangling with the hospital's billing reps, Weaver finally stormed into the facility and kicked her heels up on the desk of the chief administrator. "Obviously, I have both of my feet," she told him.

Weaver eventually persuaded the hospital to drop the charges but in the process discovered that the mistake wasn't a simple billing error. Weaver's identity had been stolen by a fraudster who had used her personal information—her address, Social Security number, and even her insurance ID number—to have the expensive procedure performed. The nightmare didn't end there. When Weaver was hospitalized a year later for a hysterectomy, she realized the amputee's medical info was now mixed in with her own after a nurse reviewed her chart and said, "I see you have diabetes." (She doesn't.) With medical data expected to begin flowing more freely among health-care providers, Weaver now frets that if she is ever rushed to a hospital, she could receive improper care—a transfusion with the wrong type of blood, for instance, or a medicine to which she's allergic. "I now live in fear that if something ever happened to me, I could get the wrong kind of medical treatment," she says.

Weaver's experience isn't an isolated case. Medical identity theft—in which fraudsters impersonate unsuspecting individuals to get costly care they couldn't otherwise afford—is growing. Based on Federal Trade Commission surveys, Pam Dixon, executive director of the World Privacy Forum, a San Diego-based research group, estimates that more than 250,000 Americans have had their medical information stolen and misused in recent years. And this isn't petty larceny. Experts note that while individuals who have had their credit-card data stolen are usually wrangling with their banks over losses of as little as a few thousand dollars, medical ID theft can leave victims, and the doctors and hospitals that provided the care, staring at bills that are exponentially higher.

Yet the thief isn't always an individual desperately needing medical care. In some instances, the perpetrator can be a doctor hoping to pad his or her income by filing fraudulent claims. Even worse, law enforcement authorities say that more and more frauds are being perpetrated by organized crime rings who steal dozens, and sometimes thousands, of medical records, as well as the billing codes for doctors. The rings then set up fake medical clinics—offering free health screenings as a ruse to draw in patients—that submit bogus bills to insurers, collect payments for a few months, and then disappear before the insurers realize they've been had. (Dixon notes that health records now fetch $50 to $60 each on the black market, vs. a mere 7 cents for stolen résumés.)

Last year, California authorities busted a ring in Milpitas that recruited patients from a local senior citizen center with offers of a free checkup and a case of Ensure nutritional supplement. In the three months before authorities raided the clinic, the ring had billed $900,000 for diagnostic tests it had never performed. "Yesterday's drug dealers are now working in today's health-care fraud," says John Askins, an investigator in Florida's state insurance fraud division. "It's more lucrative, and they don't face the same dangers they do in the narcotics trade." The penalties, if they're caught, are lower, too.

Health-care providers say the Bush Administration's initiative to push doctors and hospitals to convert their paper-based patient files into digital records should help reduce the number of medical ID frauds. "Our software has become more sophisticated, particularly in identifying spikes in usage—someone who normally goes to the doctor once a year and suddenly goes 25 times in a 12-month period. It's a red flag," says Byron Hollis, national anti-fraud director for the Blue Cross Blue Shield Assn., a trade group for 39 health plans.

But some privacy advocates fear that the rush toward digital health records could ironically create new nightmares for victims of medical ID theft. Rather than residing in a single doctor's paper files, fraudulent information—such as the erroneous diabetes diagnosis in Lind Weaver's records—could circulate in other medical databases across the country. Given that some medical ID thefts are "inside jobs," wherein rogue clerks sell patient data to fraudsters on the outside, privacy advocates believe that allowing data to flow more freely around a national network could make such thefts even easier. "We can expect [medical ID theft] to grow the more we move toward an electronic health-care system. It's going to be a disaster," says Dr. Deborah Peel, an Austin (Tex.) psychiatrist and founder of the Patient Privacy Rights Foundation.

Even worse, it can be difficult for patients to purge any fraud from their records. While the Fair Credit Reporting Act gives victims of financial identity theft the right to see and try to correct any mistakes in their credit records, critics say that victims of medical ID theft don't have the same recourse. Health privacy laws "are limited and don't reflect the possibility of medical ID theft," notes Robert Gellman, a leading privacy consultant in Washington. "Negative information could just bounce around the system forever."

For some victims, the pain is real. Take the case of Joe Ryan. In early 2004, the 60-year-old owner of a Colorado sightseeing business (he flies passengers in a modern replica of a 1939 biplane) got a bill from a hospital outside Denver. The hospital was seeking $41,188 for surgery that Ryan says he hadn't had performed. Ryan called the hospital and, in time, realized that someone had stolen his personal information to pay for the surgery. Eventually, investigators traced the crime to a former clerk at a newspaper in which Ryan had placed an ad for his sightseeing business. "He asked for my Social Security number, and I now realize I shouldn't have given it to him," says Ryan.

When Ryan tried to correct his records, he discovered how difficult it can be for victims to clear their names. The hospital wouldn't let him see his own medical records when they determined that the signature on the driver's license Ryan handed them didn't match the signature that the perpetrator had used when he checked in. "They said I couldn't be Joe Ryan," he recalls. While the hospital eventually absorbed the loss, Ryan says he hasn't been able to completely erase the supposedly unpaid debt from his credit record. With his credit ruined, Ryan says he has had to pay a stiff interest rate—six points over the prime rate—when he refinanced his plane, and his insurance company has jacked up his premium. "It has been like a glacier moving over me," he says. "I'm just screwed because I'm going to lose my airplane, my business, and my credit rating."

In other instances, the thief can be a patient's own doctor. Debra Herritt discovered that after she and her husband began seeing a Boston psychiatrist, Richard P. Skodnek, in the 1990s. After two years of therapy, Herritt began receiving statements from her insurer, Blue Cross & Blue Shield Assn. of Massachusetts, showing that Skodnek had billed Blue Cross for sessions the Herritts had already covered. What's more, Herrit learned that Skodnek had also billed her son and daughter for psychiatric sessions that Debra says never occurred. "My children had never laid eyes on him," she says. Fortunately for Herritt, the feds were already on Skodnek's trail for defrauding other patients, and in 1996 the psychiatrist was convicted on 136 counts. Even then, Herritt says she spent the next couple of years trying to convince Blue Cross that her children had never been treated for depression. "It was an incredible invasion of their lives," Herritt says now. "I just pray this doesn't come back to haunt them somewhere down the road."


`YOU'D BE ASTONISHED' 
Law enforcement authorities complain that many health-care facilities do too little to protect their patient data. Case in point: In September, federal authorities arrested a scheduling clerk at the Cleveland Clinic's Weston (Fla.) hospital who allegedly had passed on the personal identification information of more than 1,100 patients to her cousin—who in turn submitted $2.8 million in false claims to Medicare. "Hospitals have done a poor job of implementing security procedures on their computer systems," says one federal investigator. "You'd be astonished how many people have access to your medical records." (Cleveland Clinic officials say they notified law enforcement officials when fraud was detected in June, and say they've since conducted an internal risk assessment to prevent such a problem in the future.)

In their defense, health-care executives say they've taken steps in recent years to deter identity thieves. Some hospitals, for instance, have begun reprogramming their computer systems to restrict staffers from accessing any patient data beyond what they need to do their jobs. And some have instituted procedures to ensure patients are who they claim to be.


Among them is the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington. After one patient impersonating a distant relative gained admittance and ran up more than $76,000 in bills in his cousin's name, hospital administrators two years ago began requiring anyone seeking treatment to produce a picture ID. "We've since had instances where patients say, I left my ID in the car,' then leave and never return," says Marie Whalen, the center's assistant vice-president for ambulatory services. And beginning next March, Whalen says the center will begin scanning these picture IDs into their files to help staffers confirm each patient's identity on subsequent visits. "Most people are fine with that," she says. Indeed, it may be a small price to pay to avoid ID theft.


Click here to link to Business Week Article

Return to Top


 

Identity Theft News: 2008 Data Breach Count  as of 8/22/08 surpasses total for 2007  
August 22, 2008

Identity theft experts at The Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC) found that the data breach count has reached an all-time high. Information management is critically important to all of us - as employees and consumers.  For that reason, the Identity Theft Resource Center has been tracking security breaches for the past three years, looking for patterns, new trends and any information that may help us better protect data and assist companies in their activities.

2008 Figures
The total number of breaches in on the Identity Theft Resource Center’s 2008 breach list surpassed the final total of 446 reported in 2007, more than 4 months before the end of 2008.   As of 9:30 a.m. August 22nd, the number of confirmed data breaches in 2008 stood at 449.   The actual number of breaches is most likely higher, due to under-reporting and the fact that some of the breaches reported, which affect multiple businesses, are listed as single events.   In the last few months, two subcontractors became examples of these “multiple” events.   In one case, the customers and/or employees of at least 20 entities were affected by a breach that the ITRC reported as a single breach event.

It should be noted that the ITRC does not place an inordinate weight on the count of records exposed.   While the ITRC breach list reflects compromised records of more than 22 million people, in more than 40% of breach events, the number of records exposed is not reported or fully disclosed. This means the number of affected records is grossly incomplete and unusable for any statistic or research purpose.   The use of potentially affected records generally causes more concern and is ‘news-sexy’.

The ITRC breach list is a compilation of breaches confirmed by various media sources, notification lists from state governmental agencies.   ITRC uses several websites to help search for verifiable breaches, such as pogowasright.org, phiprivacy.net, The Breach Blog and attrition.org.   To qualify breaches must include personal identifying information that could lead to identity theft, especially the loss of Social Security numbers.

Click here for the 2008 ITRC Breach report.   Click here for the 2008 ITRC Breach Stats Report broken down by categories which includes the percentages for each category (business, financial/credit, educational, governmental/military and health care).  Please check regularly as this list is updated weekly.
 

Return to Top

Agencies Issue Final Rules on Identity Theft Red Flags and Notices of Address Discrepancy
October 31, 2007

The Federal Trade Commission and the federal financial institution regulatory agencies have sent to the Federal Register for publication final rules on identity theft “red flags” and address discrepancies. The final rules implement sections 114 and 315 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003.

According to a report of the President’s Identity Theft Task Force, identity theft (a fraud attempted or committed using identifying information of another person without authority), results in billions of dollars in losses each year to individuals and businesses.

The final rules require each financial institution and creditor that holds any consumer account, or other account for which there is a reasonably foreseeable risk of identity theft, to develop and implement an Identity Theft Prevention Program (Program) for combating identity theft in connection with new and existing accounts. The Program must include reasonable policies and procedures for detecting, preventing, and mitigating identity theft and enable a financial institution or creditor to:

  1. Identify relevant patterns, practices, and specific forms of activity that are “red flags” signaling possible identity theft and incorporate those red flags into the Program;
  2. Detect red flags that have been incorporated into the Program;
  3. Respond appropriately to any red flags that are detected to prevent and mitigate identity theft; and
  4. Ensure the Program is updated periodically to reflect changes in risks from identity theft.

The agencies also issued guidelines to assist financial institutions and creditors in developing and implementing a Program, including a supplement that provides examples of red flags.

The final rules also require credit and debit card issuers to develop policies and procedures to assess the validity of a request for a change of address that is followed closely by a request for an additional or replacement card. In addition, the final rules require users of consumer reports to develop reasonable policies and procedures to apply when they receive a notice of address discrepancy from a consumer reporting agency.

The attached final rulemaking is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Trade Commission, the National Credit Union Administration, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Office of Thrift Supervision. The final rules are effective on January 1, 2008. Covered financial institutions and creditors must comply with the rules by November 1, 2008.

The final rule will be published soon and can be found on the Commission’s Web site as a link to this press release. The Commission vote authorizing the publication of the final rule and Federal Register notice was 5-0. (FTC File No. R611019). The staff contacts are Naomi Lefkovitz or Pavneet Singh, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 202-326-2252; see press release dated July 18, 2006.

Copies of the document mentioned in this release are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. Call toll-free: 1-877-FTC-HELP.

Return to Top


 

BIO-key  gives retailers, financial institutions and application providers tools to easily build a secure, convenient authentication solution!    

 
BIO-key’s implementation team can guide you through the steps to implement this extremely cost effective, secure alternative to passwords, tokens and PINs, while maintaining a smooth user experience.  

 BIO-key gives you the ability to positively identify users before granting them access to your valuable corporate resources, web portals or applications in seconds. Powered by our patented Vector Segment Technology™ our solutions help you seamlessly integrate fingerprint biometrics into your applications. Compatible with most major operating platforms and databases,  BIO-key development tools deliver a tangible return on your security platform investment that: 
            ·  Quickly & Accurately Identifies Users
            ·  Improves User Convenience
            ·  Lowers Operating Costs

Click Here to contact  your BIO-key account team or email us at sales@bio-key.com

 

Return to Top

 





 

 

Whitepapers
Industry Links
Biometrics 101
   - About Fingerprints
©2005 - BIO-key International, Inc.